Cost of Living: Beverly Hills, CA vs San Francisco, CA

Quick rent-and-take-home comparison

Using a baseline of $70,000/yr gross, take-home is about $3,974/mo in Beverly Hills, CA versus $3,974/mo in San Francisco, CA. In the model, rent is about 40.87% of gross in Beverly Hills, CA versus 35.25% in San Francisco, CA, so San Francisco, CA tends to feel more affordable for rent.

Take-home in Beverly Hills, CA

$3,974/mo

Income level: below

Take-home in San Francisco, CA

$3,974/mo

Income level: below

Rent share (1BR) in Beverly Hills, CA

40.87%

COLI tier: mid-range

Rent share (1BR) in San Francisco, CA

35.25%

COLI tier: very high-cost

Compare cost of living, rent, housing prices, and salary affordability between Beverly Hills, CA and San Francisco, CA.

At a glance

Cheaper overall (lower cost-of-living index): Beverly Hills, CA
Lower rent (median 1BR/2BR): San Francisco, CA
Lower home prices: San Francisco, CA
Higher median household income: San Francisco, CA

Cost of Living Index

Beverly Hills, CA: 100 (U.S. = 100) · San Francisco, CA: 225.8 (U.S. = 100)

Beverly Hills, CA has a lower cost-of-living index than San Francisco, CA, so a given salary generally stretches further there.

Median Rent

Beverly Hills, CA: $2,665/mo (midpoint of 1BR/2BR) · San Francisco, CA: $2,298/mo

Median rent in Beverly Hills, CA is $367/mo higher than in San Francisco, CA.

Median Home Price

Beverly Hills, CA: $2,000,001 · San Francisco, CA: $1,380,500

Median home price in Beverly Hills, CA is $619,501 higher than in San Francisco, CA.

Median Household Income

Beverly Hills, CA: $127,979 · San Francisco, CA: $141,446

San Francisco, CA has a higher median household income than Beverly Hills, CA by $13,467.

Beverly Hills, CA overview · San Francisco, CA overview · Popular comparisons