Cost of Living: Bakersfield, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Quick rent-and-take-home comparison
Using a baseline of $70,000/yr gross, take-home is about $3,974/mo in Bakersfield, CA versus $3,974/mo in San Francisco, CA. In the model, rent is about 19.97% of gross in Bakersfield, CA versus 35.25% in San Francisco, CA, so Bakersfield, CA tends to feel more affordable for rent.
Compare cost of living, rent, housing prices, and salary affordability between Bakersfield, CA and San Francisco, CA.
At a glance
- Cheaper overall (lower cost-of-living index): Bakersfield, CA
- Lower rent (median 1BR/2BR): Bakersfield, CA
- Lower home prices: Bakersfield, CA
- Higher median household income: San Francisco, CA
Cost of Living Index
Bakersfield, CA: 100 (U.S. = 100) · San Francisco, CA: 225.8 (U.S. = 100)
Bakersfield, CA has a lower cost-of-living index than San Francisco, CA, so a given salary generally stretches further there.
Median Rent
Bakersfield, CA: $1,303/mo (midpoint of 1BR/2BR) · San Francisco, CA: $2,298/mo
Median rent in San Francisco, CA is $995/mo higher than in Bakersfield, CA.
Median Home Price
Bakersfield, CA: $347,300 · San Francisco, CA: $1,380,500
Median home price in San Francisco, CA is $1,033,200 higher than in Bakersfield, CA.
Median Household Income
Bakersfield, CA: $77,397 · San Francisco, CA: $141,446
San Francisco, CA has a higher median household income than Bakersfield, CA by $64,049.
Bakersfield, CA overview · San Francisco, CA overview · Popular comparisons